1. The Problem: Commercial Software & International Returns
This case concerns the distinction between income reporting and separate information-return obligations, including IRS Form 3520. Product coverage and prompts vary by software version and tax year.
Professional preparers must independently evaluate information-return obligations. A software prompt or completed income tax return does not establish that all separate reporting requirements have been satisfied.
2. Detailed Case Analysis: Huang v. United States
Factual Background
The taxpayer in Huang v. United States (N.D. Cal., Case No. 24-cv-06298-RS) received foreign gifts from her non-U.S. parents in 2015 and 2016. A non-tax-expert, she used TurboTax to prepare her individual tax returns. When inputting details into TurboTax, she encountered an explicit software guidance prompt stating:
"If you received the money, no matter how much or how little, you don't report anything."
Relying in good faith on this instruction, she did not file Form 3520. Years later, the IRS automatically assessed over $153,000 in penalties under IRC § 6039F (which included severe IRS calculation errors that doubled her penalties before partial abatement). After submitting a Form 843 refund request, she sued the government in U.S. District Court under 26 U.S.C. § 7422.
Chief Judge Seeborg's Ruling (May 28, 2025)
The IRS moved to dismiss the lawsuit under Rule 12(b)(6), arguing that under United States v. Boyle, taxpayers cannot rely on software to excuse late filings. Chief Judge Seeborg denied the government's motion to dismiss on reasonable cause, establishing crucial legal principles:
- Affirmative Software Misdirection: Unlike cases where software simply failed to remind a user, TurboTax affirmatively advised the taxpayer that foreign gifts were non-reportable. The alleged reliance was part of the claim evaluated at the motion-to-dismiss stage; it does not establish that software reliance always excuses a filing failure.
- Complexity of Foreign Gift Rules: Quoting Congdon v. United States (E.D. Tex. 2011), the court held that taxpayer inexperience combined with the complexity and obscurity of foreign gift reporting (§ 6039F) plausibly supports a reasonable cause defense.
- Tax Court Precedent (Olsen): Cited Olsen v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2011-277, discussing good-faith efforts and software errors in its own factual context.
3. Limits of This Case Summary
This article is background reading, not a recommended defense or statement template. A procedural ruling allowing a claim to proceed does not establish entitlement to penalty relief. The relevance of any authority, its procedural posture, subsequent developments, and a client’s evidence require independent professional analysis.
Agena Software does not recommend legal arguments or represent taxpayers in penalty disputes.
Need to File a Delinquent Form 3520?
Prepare Form 3520 using your own professional analysis. For supported initial late Part IV filings, the software can format your statement; it does not select case authorities, draft a legal defense, or determine eligibility for relief.
Start Form 3520 Workspace →